Skip to main content

Doing the Homework



The County Council is set to vote on proposed legislation about single-use plastic bags tonight. There has been some discussion about this locally and, up until now, I haven’t felt like jumping into the fray. Well, better late than never.

Here are some articles which analyze research on the topic:


Are Plastic Bag Bans Garbage?
April 9, 2019

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2019/04/09/711181385/are-plastic-bag-bans-garbage

Why Carryout Bag Fees Are More Effective Than Plastic Bag Bans
January 20, 2017


Do plastic bag taxes or bans curb waste? 400 cities and states tried it out.

August 27, 2019


Banning Plastic Bags Is Great for the World, Right? Not So Fast (June 10, 2016) https://www.wired.com/2016/06/banning-plastic-bags-great-world-right-not-fast/

This quote stood out: The ideal city bag policy would pronounce involve charging for paper and plastic single-use bags, as New York City has decided to do, while giving out recycled-plastic bags to those who need them, especially to low-income communities and seniors. (The crunchy rich should already have more than enough tote bags from PBS and Whole Foods.)

If you want to see a full scale defense of plastic bags, make sure to take in this commercial website: (insert eye-roll here.)

Bag the Ban
The American Plastic Alliance

Here is a story about the proposed legislation in Howard County:


And here is the much touted “Amendment Three” which adds a ban into the mix.


In sum, research on communities who have enacted bag bans or bag fees shows the following:

  • A full out bag ban causes people to buy thicker plastic bags that take longer to break down than the single use ones.
  • A bag ban disproportionately impacts poorer communities.
  • Paper bags may break down faster but it takes more gasoline to move them around so they are equally problematic.
  • Those respectable cotton tote bags? Their production uses a ton of resources that far outweigh the benefits of reusing them.
  • The best reusable bags, environmentally speaking, are the plastic recycled ones.
  • A bag fee is the most effective at both cutting down on waste and changing behavior.

The loud local shouting on this is telling you the opposite. It stands to reason, they tell you, that a ban is a more environmentally sound approach. It isn’t. It stands to reason that charging a fee could mean only one thing: trying to suck more money out of consumers. It’s not.

It only stands to reason if you refuse to do your homework and you simply want to be right without the benefit of actual facts. It’s an emotional response, not an informed one.

I hope the Council will vote in favor of this legislation. If any of my readers want to make a case for or against Amendment 3,  I’m interested.

*****





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...
1 comment
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more