Skip to main content

A Suggestion

 


There has been quite a bit of hubbub over the last year pertaining to Board of Education meetings and cell phones. I don’t intend to go into individual cases here. I am wondering if it is time to say no to cell phones during board meetings. I don’t think they are necessary and I think they do more harm than good.

Of course, right now our meeting are virtual, and I’m not sure how much Board Members are consulting their phones while live on video. I must admit I’m thinking of in-person meetings out on Route 108.

Why allow cell phones at all? Are they necessary for the Board to conduct business during their meetings? 

I can see why board members might need to be reached by family in case of emergency but couldn’t there be someone on staff who was responsible to be the communication point for calls like that so they could notify the board member if needed? Other than that, aren’t cell phones on the dais doing more harm than good?

I adore my smart phone and my tablet device and yet I also see how they can sometimes be a hindrance instead of a help. It is too easy to get sucked in to knowing and responding to everything immediately. It is difficult to put them aside and pay complete and total attention to what is right in front of me. Board members are only human. They have only so much focus to give during a given meeting and it seems counterproductive to add electronic devices into the mix.

Accusations abound of who is texting who during board meetings and whether this constitutes a violation of the rules. That makes me wonder. Haven't our schools have struggled with how to handle students and cell phones? We have revisited the policy at least once, if not more. Maybe it’s time to have a cell phone policy for the Board.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...
1 comment
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more