Skip to main content

Food Chain


Have you seen this?

REAL ESTATE:

What a hedge fund’s $1 billion play has to do with downtown Columbia Lillian Reed, Baltimore Banner

Well! 

I didn’t, as they say, have this on my bingo card. But I suppose we should talk about it. The article begins like this:

The hedge fund is displeased.

Billionaire Bill Ackman of investment firm Pershing Square made that much clear in his letter Monday to Howard Hughes Holdings, the Texas-based developer that owns much of downtown Columbia.

Pershing Square owns a 38% stake in Howard Hughes and has been frustrated for months with the company’s stock price. Ackman’s letter this week put Howard Hughes’ board of directors on notice that the firm now wants to pay $1 billion to snap up more of the developer’s stock with the intent of a merger.

There’s a local conversation about this going on over on the Columbia reddit, if you are interested.

I am no expert in real estate, mergers, or hedge funds. But, like all of you, I have opinions. The Howard Hughes Corporation is far bigger than just Columbia, of course. I have a hard time seeing that bigger picture. To me, this article is primarily about my home. Tunnel vision, maybe. Understandable? I think so.

Here is my wildly simplified take on what’s at stake here: 

Columbia was created by a man, Rouse, and a company, The Rouse Company. The Rouse Company was an entity that did things. That’s what it was for. Eventually it was sold to a company that wanted to own the companies that did things (General Growth ) then spun off to a new company that wanted to own and develop the real estate holdings created by the companies that did things.

Are you still with me? 

Bill Ackman talks about wanting to use his investment capabilities to turn Howard Hughes into something like Berkshire Hathaway.  In grossly simple terms, Berkshire Hathaway is a company that amasses companies that bought companies that were originally companies that actually did something.

When I look at this it sounds a lot like what happened to the Baltimore Sun and what has happened to newspapers all over this country. I cannot name one example in which this turned out well either for the newspapers or for the communities who would be better served by high quality, professional journalism.

Or think of what has happened as private equity firms buy into health care. 

When you are a company that makes something, or does something, you are keenly aware of where your focus should be. What constitutes excellence? Making the best somethings, or doing the best job at the something you do. If you are Bill Ackman, you are so far removed from that concept that your goals are wholly disconnected from what created those companies in the first place. 

Here is the mission statement of the Howard Hughes Corporation:

At Howard Hughes, our mission is to enhance people’s lives by building inspired, award-winning communities.

Our passionate professionals are energized by the opportunity to create a sense of discovery and wonder. To bring innovative approaches and perspectives to creating new ways of enjoying life. And to create vibrant, sustainable communities that reflect the diverse interests and priorities of their neighbors and residents.

All of this to say that at Howard Hughes, we’re not just about brick and mortar; we’re about heart and soul. And the chance to enrich life’s journey, every day.

So, are Bill Ackman and his hedge fund displeased because HHC is failing to fulfill the goals in its mission statement? Heck, no. 

It’s all about the stock price. 

I personally find the disconnect horrifying. But money is money and ownership is ownership and I don’t see how we could possibly have any say here. Friends, I have never felt exactly warm and cuddly about the Howard Hughes Corporation but this feels a whole lot worse. 

What do you think?


Village Green/Town² Comments 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more