Skip to main content

Normal? Who Decides What’s Normal?


 

An issue that comes up every so often is the fact that some Board of Education members participate in meetings online and some in person. It is understandable that some folks, especially teachers, have a bone to pick with this as it was the Board that was insistent on returning teachers to face-to-face teaching in the classroom before the majority were able to be fully vaccinated against COVID. It is easy from that standpoint to see Board members’ actions as saying, “in person for thee but not for me.”

But let’s zoom out to look at the practice of online/hybrid meetings as a whole. The pandemic was certainly the cause of their proliferation. But, several years on, I can see many good reasons for offering the option in a variety of settings. Why? Because it removes obstacles to participation. 

Streaming public meetings and religious services (with replay available) opens a door to engagement not simply to the immunocompromised, but also addresses other challenges. For example, community members may not be able to attend in person because:

  • they are caregivers of young children, the elderly, or disabled
  • they themselves are elderly or disabled 
  • they don’t have adequate transportation 
  • employment commitments make getting to the meetings difficult or impossible 
And there are probably more that I am not thinking of at the moment.

Allowing the option of remote interaction has been a boon in health care and mental health treatment as well. I’m not suggesting that it works for everything but it absolutely has shown its worth over the last several years. 

Yesterday, while participating in an online church service, I heard the words, “As we move away from the pandemic…” and it made me wonder if there is now a push to “move away” from accommodations that were instituted because of COVID without evaluating whether they may have enduring value. As so often is the case, “the return to normal” isn’t normal for everybody. The people who were being excluded from community life pre-COVID were often simply invisible to “normal” folks. 

I have spent quite some time bemoaning the fact that the CA Board often makes decisions without hearing from the whole of the community because certain chunks of it are never “in the room.” That concept is broader than the Columbia Association or the Board of Education. Online participation allows more (and different) people to be in the room and that is a good thing. 

When I hear people say they want to go back to normal what I hear is that they are just fine without having those people in the room. 

We may have “discovered” Zoom meetings and streamed events because of COVID and boy, many of us are probably sick of them. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t something there to be learned beyond the avoidance of sickness. Removing obstacles to participation is good for everyone. 

I’m not so keen on going back to normal if it means going back to forgetting about the people who don’t fit in.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more