Banner Headlines

It’s another one of those crazy car mornings over here. There are two articles worth taking a look at today, both in the Baltimore Banner.

Hispanic, Asian, multiracial population growth boosted Howard County in 2023, Ramsey Archibald, Baltimore Banner

And:

Columbia is good for families. But can it draw more young professionals?, Jess Nocera and Abby Zimmardi, Baltimore Banner

Both seem to me to be pieces of a larger puzzle which might be called, “Who comes, who stays, who leaves. And: why?”

One thing I noticed in the article about young professionals was that the only visually identifiable Black resident in any of the photos was the County Executive. I can’t automatically tell you what that means but it definitely means something.

I’m not saying that it was the Banner’s job to seek out a suitable number of young professional Black people to round out their photographs. But I am wondering if Columbia has Third Spaces where young Black professionals feel comfortable and are thriving. I wonder if the reporters who wrote the article saw the attitudes and inclusion of Black Columbians as something that matters.

It matters.

Attracting young professionals is a big goal of the Howard Hughes Corporation and a lot of their recent work seems to be geared at attracting young folks with buying power. Still, largely because of the long gap in Downtown Columbia’s development, much of what they have done feels like pockets of urban living “dropped into suburbia without the means to be successfully interconnected and functional.”

It doesn’t feel organic. Granted, someday it may. Right now it feels rather like that small expensive piece of decor that the tv home designers claim will “bring a moment of luxury to the room.”

Also of note: the Columbia Association’s brief foray into caring about what the young people think with the advent of the (ill-fated) Millennial Advisory Committee. By the time they got around to reaching out to Millennials I wonder if they were aware that Gen Z was coming and would matter, too.

I don’t know. This is not a critique. Think of it as morning musings on a Columbia theme.

Village Green/Town² Comments

Comments

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents. When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday. Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018. 2018 . But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest. In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...

Separate and Unequal

Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not. It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...

Village Green/Town²

Search This Blog