Skip to main content

The Show Must Go On



I had a visit from our youngest this week. We talked a bit about current events and the onslaught of distressing news right now. Something interesting emerged.

“I have a friend who’s never had anyone to teach them how to tell whether things on the Internet are real or not. And right now there’s so many upsetting things out there. So we sit down and I have been explaining how you can tell if something is fake, or how to tell if something is an unreliable or discredited source.”

I was proud. And I was grateful to have a kid who is capable of doing that and would take the time to do that to help someone else. 

I’ve been thinking a lot since then about what makes it possible to be media literate/savvy these days. My kid is a graduate of the county schools, has a liberal arts degree from UMBC, and has family who reads, discusses, and analyzes current events. A lot.

Is that where it comes from? Did education develop and hone those critical thinking skills and did family experiences provide continued opportunities to stretch and deepen them? And I wonder if part of it is something innate that makes one want to dig deeper and understand, reaching beyond surface soundbites and clickbait?

In the midst of my pondering I came across this post by writer Ally Henny:

Believe it or not, but being educated in the arts is also an important part of media literacy. 

A lot of people, and by people I mean folks who use this app and not just young people, who are unable to discern when things are staged, when stuff has been edited, when a video is a skit, satire, etc. I believe that a lot of this is happening at least in part because of a lack of exposure or familiarity with the arts. 

And, of course, this isn’t a judgment. But I think it might help explain a lot.

My kid, this kid who is no longer a kid, is my one hundred per cent musical theatre kid. Participated in band, choral singing, and acapella groups. Performed in school musicals and went to musical theatre camps. Has a degree in theatre studies. Teaches voice, piano, drama, and directs both musicals and straight drama productions.

Boom.

This reminds me of a piece I wrote back in October about the Humanities.

Studying topics within the humanities (this includes the arts, remember) provides us with the tools to think creatively and critically, to reason, and ask questions. Additionally, it fosters the ability to look at things from different points of view, which, in turn, develops empathy. All of these things are crucial in becoming active and informed in civic engagement. They contribute to building better informed and more consistent voters plus they are strong motivators for community engagement and volunteering.

Human brains are not merely overgrown vending machines with neat rows of separated silos of products waiting to be purchased. So much about how we learn and who we are is an amazing interconnected web of possibilities. To devalue and eliminate the humanities cuts us off from a profound element of who we are.

It also weakens our ability to participate in democracy or even to understand it.

If we can’t tell whether things that are being presented to us are real or false, how can we stay informed and engage/participate in a democratic society?

…being educated in the arts is also an important part of media literacy. 

Not the only part, mind you, but an important one. And we, as parents or as role models to young people, can empower that essential growth in media literacy by validating their involvement in arts experiences. And then someday it will be one of those kids sitting down with a friend and showing them how to discern truth from trickery.

*****

An almost unbelievable postscript to this story is the announcement late yesterday that the current President intends to seize control of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. It could not be more clear: attempts to control and suppress artistic expression are the hallmarks of anti-democratic political systems. - - jam


Village Green/Town² Comments




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more