Skip to main content

Losing Sight of Freedom






Dear Senator Alsobrooks: I want my vote back.

I didn’t expect to wake up to this news as I scanned Bluesky this morning, but: there it was. 

Here are the 28 Dem Senators who voted to advance the first federal ban on trans athletes & a federal definition of sex that would make trans & intersex people non-existent: Angela Alsobrooks (MD), Tammy Baldwin (WI), Richard Blumenthal (CT), Lisa Blunt Rochester (DE), Chris Coons (DE)…

I noticed a comment:

Angela Alsobrooks, grand marshal of the 50th baltimore pride parade

Really? 

Really???

Yup.


Image from Angela Alsobrooks social media accounts


The photo above was accompanied by these words:

I was so honored to lead Baltimore's 50th Pride Parade as Grand Marshal and celebrate with our community in love and appreciation for our LGBTQ neighbors.

We must never lose sight that everyone deserves the freedom to be who they are and love who they love.

I am livid. 

When did Ms. Alsobrooks “lose sight that everyone deserves the freedom to be who they are?” Is it possible that she never truly had it in the first place? Or that it was convenient to say until it was put to the test?

I had the opportunity to meet Ms. Alsobrooks and hear her speak when she was running for this senate seat. There were a lot of good reasons to support her and wrote about them at the time. 

This summer I had an opportunity to attend a meet and greet event for Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks, who is running for the Senate seat which will open when Benjamin Cardin retires. I found her to be experienced, confident, capable, and more than ready to take on the responsibilities of the job. In addition, I’ve been pretty vocal on the blog that Maryland needs more women, especially Black women, in positions of elected leadership. 

Why? Because representation matters. Different perspectives matter. When voices are missing then all too often needs and aspirations are overlooked, or worse - - seen and yet still neglected. 

- - Making Choices and Honoring Voices in Maryland’s Senate Race, October 25, 2023

One thing I didn’t write about was her response to my question during the Q & A portion of the evening.

She hadn’t spoken about LGBTQIA rights during her speech, so I asked what her plans were to protect their rights and be responsive to their concerns. I was, honestly, disappointed in her response. It didn’t show much thought or commitment. 

How to characterize it - - lame? Anemic? Weak sauce?

The fact that she wasn’t ready with a well-thought out response that showed passion and commitment concerned me. 

There were plenty of good reasons to support Ms. Alsobrooks at the time. This stayed with me like a nagging worry. I hoped I was wrong.

It looks like I wasn’t.

To clarify, this is something that was tacked on to a defense appropriations bill. As such it may only apply to military academies. Nonetheless, it is a governmental codification of people who must be banned or excluded. To me, such a vote is inexcusable. We are living through a time where we see forces determined to extinguish the rights of trans Americans in every area of life. Democrats should be fighting this, loudly. At the very least they should not be helping.

Let me rephrase that. Any decent human being should be fighting this. 

I am left this morning with my own words and a deep regret that my Senator, when push comes to shove, doesn’t represent my values and the people I care about.

Representation matters. Different perspectives matter. When voices are missing then all too often needs and aspirations are overlooked, or worse - - seen and yet still neglected. 


Village Green/Town² Comments 


Comments

  1. Julia A. McCreadyDecember 16, 2025 at 4:50 AM

    Please do not submit comments here. This function will be disabled shortly. Use the link above instead. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more