Skip to main content

The Value of Human Life

 


The thing I should be writing about today is this, and it is breaking me. 

Howard County officers cleared in fatal shooting of man with autism, Lillian Reed, Baltimore Banner 

About twenty per cent of US residents identify as neurodivergent. That includes those who are autistic. Neurodivergence means that your brain operates differently. Different than what? Ahh…that’s the thing.

It’s all about being different than established norms. What makes the world more disabling for neurodivergent people is the insistence that there is only one way, the neurotypical way, and anyone else is different. Wrong. A problem. 

If our goal was to accommodate everyone, autism and other neurodivergent conditions would be far less disabling. It is the lack of awareness of this and the resulting lack of accommodation which creates disabling attitudes and situations daily. 

It’s not about some people getting something extra. The fact is our world accommodates people with neurotypical brains. If you are neurotypical you are getting the something extra all the time. The world is set up the way your brain needs it to be.

Our goal could be to accommodate everyone* according to their particular needs. We chose not to do that. So, what does that mean?

If you are neurodivergent: 

  • your education will be compromised
  • your ability to find challenging and meaningful work will be compromised
  • your ability to succeed and be financially independent is compromised, 
  • your safety in situations where you encounter law enforcement is compromised

This is the story of why Alex Lamoire, autistic, living independently in a community built to foster neurodivergent residents, was shot by three Howard County Police officers while he was experiencing a mental health crisis.

Lamoire did not behave the way their neurotypical brains told them he should. So they shot him. They were not neutralizing danger. They were neutralizing a variable that they were unprepared to handle.

We can require workplace training in blood borne pathogens, first aid and CPR, but we don’t require comprehensive training in how to work with neurodivergent humans? Why not? There should be training and it should be rigorous and ongoing. 

This is not the time to say that it’s tragic and “oh, that’s too bad but it was unavoidable.” 

This was absolutely preventable. By not holding these officers accountable we are saying that to be autistic is to be so unimportant that your life is not worth valuing and protecting. 

When members of the police force respond to a scene like the one at Patuxent Commons, they should have had so much training that they were prepared to do the things that will truly make that situation safe. Clearly they had not. 

When I first wrote about this in April, I concluded:

The police department must be trained and supported and evaluated and held legally responsible for serving all members of the community. Fact: humans come in a variety of manifestations. All are equally valuable. If our police do not acknowledge that and act accordingly they are not fulfilling their mission.

Autistic residents in Howard County and parents with autistic children look at this ruling and know exactly what it says: if you do not behave in a manner that makes sense to a neurotypical police officer, they can kill you.


Village Green/Town² Comments


*I am aware that neurodivergence is not the only way that the majority assumes power over those deemed the minority. This post deals specifically with autistic and other neurodivergent people. 

Comments

  1. Julia A. McCreadyJuly 9, 2026 at 6:58 AM

    Please do not submit comments here. This function will be disabled shortly. Use the link above instead. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...
1 comment
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more