F ³ The Books That Built a Bully’s Bullhorn

I have always been opposed to book burning. I was brought up to believe that books are our friends. From the moment that I was old enough to understand that book burning represents the violent suppression of ideas and intellectual freedom, I have known it was wrong.

Yesterday I had a bad moment that challenged those beliefs. It wasn’t more than a few seconds.

British fiction author JK Rowling inserted herself into an event at the Paris Olympics and spewed a lot of hateful, ignorant nonsense. And for just a moment I wished that all her books would burst into flame.

It’s not the books that are the problem. The harm that is caused by JK Rowling comes from her brain, her attitudes, her appalling lack of knowledge and empathy. But the multimillion dollar success of her books has given her a platform to make hateful accusations about transgender human beings who have never done her any harm. This weekend she chose to extend that to anyone who doesn’t look cisgender enough to meet her own personal criteria.

If it weren’t for the fortune generated by those books, Rowling would be just another hateful, uninformed busybody. Her outsized influence with others who share her backward and harmful views would never have existed.

All of us have a choice in life to use our powers for good or evil. When you look at Rowling you see what wealth and fame has empowered and it’s ugly. Imagine how much good her money and social capital might have brought into the world if she had chosen love instead of hate.

If an unknown Rowling had stood on a box in Hyde Park and ranted against trans, non binary, and intersex people would she be raking in the cash? I doubt it. Yet, here we are, witnessing all the hurt that one person can cause by harnessing the discretionary income of millions of fiction readers.

I still don’t believe in book burning. There’s no solution in that. The solution comes, I hope, in standing up to bullies and in refusing to buy what they are selling.

Village Green/Town² Comments

Comments

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents. When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word. Days passed. They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts. Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public. So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that. But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...

Separate and Unequal

Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not. It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...

Village Green/Town²

Search This Blog