Skip to main content

Good Neighbors?


 

If you are able to access it, I’d like to recommend this piece in the Baltimore Banner: 

A chemical company wants to recycle plastics in Columbia. Neighbors worry about the impact on air quality. Jess Nocera, Baltimore Banner

A Maryland-based chemical company with a history of environmental violations is planning to build a pilot plastics recycling plant within a mile of several residential neighborhoods in Columbia.

The company is W.R. Grace & Co., which has a terrible track record in environmental pollution. The proposed pilot program is to be located in a place that is widely known to be Grace’s administrative headquarters. 

This makes no sense to me. 

I don’t want to be one of those people who goes off the deep end after reading one article. So, I’m inviting you to read it, too. What is your take? Is the community right to have environmental concerns? Is placing a chemical recycling pilot plant in what was assumed to be essentially an office complex an acceptable use of that land?

It’s not lost on me that we are reading about this because the residential neighborhood in question is in an affluent county. These sorts of decisions have been foisted on poor communities and predominantly Black communities time and time again and their stories didn’t make the news until long after the damage was done. 

Something else that troubles me. 

According to a 2023 report, “Chemical Recycling: A Dangerous Deception,” this recycling process provides a “false solution.” “Chemical recycling has failed for decades, continues to fail, and there is no evidence that it will contribute to resolving the plastics pollution crisis,” according to the report published by Beyond Plastics and IPEN — the International Pollutants Elimination Network.

If attempts to put a dent in single-use plastic pollution creates a whole different kind of pollution, what’s the point of that? 


Village Green/Town² Comments


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...