Skip to main content

F ³: Ms. Rachel is a Real Person

 



Thursday: I have the greatest idea for Friday’s blog post! Friday: Oh, that’s probably a really dumb idea. Well, let’s do it anyway.

This week I saw a promo post for a HoCoLocal event that truly creeped me out. After some research I learned that it’s quite a common thing. I can’t claim to have discovered anything new or shocking and yet it still bothers me. Rather like the woman in this cartoon by the late (and brilliant) James Thurber.

Cartoon by James Thurber


This is Rachel Anne Accurso .

Photo credit Penguin Random House 

She is the creator and lead performer of Ms. Rachel Music for Littles, an extremely successful program which appears on YouTube. 

This is not Rachel Anne Accurso:


Image from PJ’s Coffee social media 


What we see here is an actor who works for a company called Courtney’s Character Corner.  Personally, I find the idea of a Ms. Rachel impersonator rather horrifying. 

Why?

We’ve all seen performers in costume suits hired to entertain children at parades, parties, and so on - - but in my experience they are embodying fictional characters.


I do not own these photos or the characters depicted.


Ms. Rachel is not a cartoon or a fictional character. She is a real human being with considerable educational training in early childhood education and music. Ms. Rachel Music for Littles is not the kind of commercial operation concocted by a studio or network where a performer is selected to “play a role” and the character “Ms. Rachel” is owned by them.

Rachel Accurso created and performs this herself. This is an important distinction.

As adults we may be used to professional impersonators in the realm of entertainment. But performing for children is an entirely different experience and should come with child-sensitive boundaries and responsibilities. I would suggest that even young children understand that Snoopy in a costume suit is not real in the sense that their dog at home is real. But presenting a carefully curated facsimile of a real human being puts a still-developing child in an uncomfortable position. 

Who do I trust? Who do I believe? If this person walked up to me in a park and wanted to go for a walk with me: are they safe in the way I know Ms. Rachel is safe?

I would find it equally appalling to see “character” companies trading on the innate credibility of people like Mychal Threets or even Mr. Rogers, for instance. Just because someone is extremely popular with kids doesn’t mean it’s okay to market their likeness for your personal profit - - especially without their consent. 

And yet. When I did a quick Google search I discovered that there are tons and tons of Ms. Rachel impersonators for hire. It made me feel quite stupid. This was yet another lesson in discovering that just because something was new to me did not mean it was a new thing overall. 

This makes me sad. 

To be clear, I don’t know whether or not Rachel Accurso has given her consent to this. I suspect not. I did try reaching out to her via Instagram but her social media accounts are not open to private messages. All things considered, that is probably a good thing. 

But I think this practice is deeply wrong. I don’t know if there are any laws that address this kind of image theft. Even worse, it’s clear that our society is moving ever more quickly towards rampant theft of other people’s creations and likenesses.

We care a lot about healthy food for our children as well as healthy environments and playthings. This isn’t healthy. It’s just junk that won’t truly nourish their imaginations or feed their souls. Most of all, it’s a lie.


Village Green/Town² Comments 

Comments

  1. Please do not submit comments here. This function will be disabled shortly. Use the link above instead. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...