Skip to main content

F ³: A Current ConversAItion


 Love hearts.

That’s what they are called on an episode of my favorite BBC panel show, “QI.”

American research scientist Janelle Shane programmed a similar neural network to read existing slogans on Love Hearts sweets, and the program suggested new slogans: "Loving horn", "Buns, buns, buns" and "All hail the chicken". 

We would call them “conversation hearts.” They’re made of sugar, cornstarch, and sentiment, I guess. They are as hard as cement and have no particular flavor. Rather like their sister sweets, Necco Wafers. Now made by Spangler, they’re marketed under the brand name “Sweethearts.” Each year they try to update their sayings a bit to remain relevant to popular culture trends. 

To my knowledge, real people make these word choices and not neural networks preloaded with specially curated content. I’m not quite sure how this all works because I think that most of these candies are purchased for kids. How will sentiments like their new theme, “Love in this economy” play at elementary school classroom parties? For example:

  • SPLIT RENT 
  • SHARE LOGIN 
  • CAR POOL 
  • BUY N BULK 
  • COOK FOR 2
I’m surprised that WAGE SLAVE 4 U is not a choice.

I’ve written about Conversation Hearts before, largely because they’re a sentimental nod to my childhood and I remain fascinated by the concept. Marketed as a food product, they’re cute and largely inedible.

But…here comes the lesson, kiddos…

The laughable failure of a computer to even remotely approximate the charm of a conversation heart is, to me, an apt reminder that AI is being marketed to us as a practically nutritious product for humankind. The truth is that at its best it is no more than cute. All while being intellectually and emotionally inedible.

In the same QI episode, host Sandi Toksvig relates that questions taken from the QI database, "Blue Whale" were loaded into an AI program, and the program was asked to come up with new questions in the same style. The results include “What happens if a flamingo is your wife?", "What is the best way to get a radiant complexion of trousering?", repeatedly asking: "How many legs does the Queen have?" and then suddenly announcing: "I'm naked." It also answered one of their own questions: "How did the Romans? Nobody knows."

Sure, it’s all fun and games until you realize that AI is already crowding out the work of real creators and artists while replacing it with products that are both flawed and inherently soulless.

Musician Thomas B. Wild, Esq. puts this in a musical way by asking “Do we want the arts to die?”



“Stop Using Generative AI”, Thomas Benjamin Wild, Esq.


And for those who fear that romance is too important to leave to their own imperfect abilities, a reminder that nothing is more beautiful than do-it-yourself affection. 

What do you think?


Village Green/Town² Comments 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...