Skip to main content

Requiem for a RECC

Ducketts Lane Elementary school is in its second year of operation and I have taught there both years. I travel to sixteen schools in Howard County teaching music and movement to preschoolers with special needs. The Learning Together program, through which special needs students and typically developing peers are combined in classes by both age and need, is housed within select elementary schools under the name RECC program. This stands for: Regional Early Childhood Center.

I recently learned that I won't be returning to Ducketts Lane next year because the program is being dissolved. The students will be absorbed by other nearby centers, probably most will go to Rockburn. The teachers will be flung into a rather complicated system of reassignment which assures them just about nothing except that they will have an opportunity to have a job.

This just blows my mind. Ducketts Lane is a brand new facility. The classrooms and materials are beautiful. The faculty and staff were drawn together with the specific intent of opening that school and making an outstanding contribution to the lives of their students. And I can vouch for how well the staff works together, and how much progress their students are making. It has been a joy to work there.

So why is this happening? Capacity.

After just two years Ducketts Lane has reached its limit and still more students are coming. Those four beautiful classrooms, occupied by the most vulnerable population in the system, are looking like some mighty appealing real estate for the elementary grades. And so--poof!--just like that, the RECC will cease to exist.

I have plenty to say about how a decision like this treats teachers and support staff like widgets, and also about how difficult it is for special needs children to adjust to change. But a greater issue to me is how we got here in the first place. How did a brand new school reach capacity in just two years? And didn't something similar happen at Veterans?

Something is clearly wrong the process whereby new housing is approved by the county and new schools are built by the system. And let's throw in redistricting while we're at it. I know that I have friends who know much more about this topic than I do. Chime in, please. Tell me why this happened. These children, their teachers and the entire support staff deserved better than this.

We still have a few more songs to sing together. I know I'll make the most of that.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...