Skip to main content

Smackdown Redux

 


Today’s post harkens back to this one in February, 2019:

Smackdown

It was a somewhat tongue-in-cheek look at the modus operandi of the folks running Maryland State Comptroller Peter Franchot’s Facebook page. In that post I named no names. It was the appalling behavior that I wanted to focus on: a consistent policy of insulting and bullying constituents who posted opinions that didn’t align with those of the Comptroller.

On October 5th the Annapolis political world was stunned at the announcement that Franchot’s adviser of twelve years, Len Foxwell, was no longer working as Chief of Staff, and would leave his office at the end of October. No other details were given.

I am hardly a Maryland politics insider, but I have been on the receiving end of Mr. Foxwell’s derisive and sexist repartee. One or two experiences taught me to stay away. I have never been able to square Mr. Franchot’s obvious ambitions for higher office with Foxwell’s curation of his social media as “life in the toxic Bro-Zone”. Call me naive, but attacking all comers (save for one’s “buds”) looks like bad constituent service and bad politics.

But what do I know? I’m just a woman and I’m not a member of the clubby Annapolis scene that produces people like Foxwell and friends.

While no reason was given for Foxwell’s departure, almost anyone who has watched him at work can think of something that might have been the last straw. I hasten to add that we could all be wrong, too, since we don’t truly know the backstory at this point.

I do hope that the new Chief of Staff will set a different tone on social media from the get-go. If Comptroller Franchot has a message he’d like to get across to Maryland residents, it will be far better served by someone who treats those residents with respect. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...