Skip to main content

Uglification



I had an unexpected opportunity to take a slow start to this day and I seized it. It can be truly delicious to take one’s time in the morning when that isn’t the usual plan of action. On the other hand, luxuriating in the extra time caused all of my blog ideas to get loose and float out into the universe. If you see any, send them back my way. 

Much of the online discourse this morning is either about last night’s Presidential debate or remembrances of 9-11. Not truly inside of my focus for the blog, although I have written about 9-11 in the past. 

So I’m going off on a tangent. (Big surprise.) Do you know what this is?



Join @MissionFirstHG, @autismsocietymd and Howard County Housing Commission for the Groundbreaking of Patuxent Commons – 76-unit housing community for adults with disabilities, seniors and families in Columbia, MD - on 10/1.

Or this?


Photo credit Enterprise Community Partners


What about this?

Image property of Dorsey Overlook 


All three represent new housing in Columbia/Howard County. And I’ve been thinking a lot (again) about how we are conditioned to look at housing construction as alarming, ugly, or wrong. I know I’ve written about this before but it’s an ongoing concern of mine.

Why is it exciting and promising in 1972 to see new housing cropping up everywhere but in 2024 it’s a harbinger of doom? When did Howard County become “full”? Was there a cut off date? Did we all wake up one morning and discover that new housing was ugly and a blight on the natural environment?

I know that among my readers I have folks who are extremely well-versed on issues of housing and zoning and local infrastructure. I am not asking for a treatise on the pros and cons of each individual project and/or the strength/weaknesses of local zoning ordinances.

I’m talking about perception.

If there is this pervasive sense that new housing is, on its face, unattractive and detrimental- - that’s something that’s learned. Because there was a time in this same area where new housing represented hope and opportunity and joy. 

It reminds me of the end of that well known Twilight Zone episode where a post-surgery patient is horrified to discover what she looks like.  To the ordinary television viewer she is perfectly lovely. But when you look at the faces of those around her…she’s not like them. And that alone is what makes her ugly. 

In order for places like Patuxent Commons, Legacy at Twin Rivers, and Dorsey Overlook to be ugly to us, we have to make an intellectual decision that they represent something not like us. Something that threatens what we have. 

Why do we do that? Do we have to do that? 


Village Green/Town² Comments 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...
1 comment
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more