Skip to main content

The Girl Code



 


It’s September in Columbia/HoCo and some of the buzz from schools is about dress-coding. 

Still? I thought we were done with this. I thought the new dress code had put us on a healthier path for dealing with student clothing choices. 

It is such an uphill battle because, in our culture, we are inundated with messages that tell us that women’s bodies are dangerously sexual and must be policed. Dress codes in schools are more of the same. They aren’t about students. They’re about “the girls”. 

But you should see what the girls

You don’t understand what the girls 

It’s really shocking what the girls

They have to do something about how the girls

It’s not a dress code. It’s a Girl Code.

If it’s hot outside a girl’s outfit is “showing too much skin.” If it’s cold and she wears leggings they’re “too clingy or revealing.” Merely by being a certain weight or body type, a girl/young woman can attracted unwanted comments and censure at school. 

We don’t hear these sorts of statements about male students. Why? It isn’t because they don’t “break the dress code.” It’s because we don’t sexualize and condemn male bodies in our school spaces. We don’t say they have a responsibility to dress in a certain way so as not to be distracting. We don’t ascribe sexual intent to them based on our judgement of their clothing choices. 

They just are. Our school dress codes, by and large*, allow boys/young men to “just be” in their educational environments. What freedom that must be. They don’t worry about the fingertip rule or the sleeveless shirt rule or if their shirt rides up if they raise their hand in class. 

From an earlier post about the institution of the new dress code:

I think we should be very careful when opining on how “those girls” just want to make a spectacle of themselves…it is these kinds of judgements that lead to all kinds of hurtful stereotyping and blaming. I wish we could agree that the foremost goal should be that the clothing is comfortable, appropriate for the weather, and suitable for the activities that our kids are doing in school. And that the aspect of clothing which pertains to self- expression is acceptable and - - dare I say it? - - welcome.

After that, perhaps we can begin to look at how young people learn to make clothing choices as steps on a developmental continuum, one that is necessary for growing into their independent, adult selves. Being teenagers, they will sometimes make mistakes, push boundaries, and, to be blunt, do stupid-ass things along the way. They need guidance. Not censure. Respect. Not shaming.

I want to be clear that I think that HCPSS has made a good deal of progress in this area. I support the new dress code and I think it is working well in many schools. I think that the negative examples I’ve been hearing about are limited to a few particular school communities. But, since poisonous attitudes about female bodies are so prevalent in our culture, this isn’t something that we can simply say once and be done with it. We need to keep discussing it with teachers, admin, and staff. We need to keep educating parents, too.

The West makes a big deal about how awful it is that certain countries make it impossible for women and girls to get an education. And it is awful. So much oppression. So much opportunity wasted. But if we maintain and allow attitudes and behaviors that sexualize and police girls bodies simply because they are girls? 

It’s just another flavor of oppression and more opportunity wasted. 




*There’s another blog post in the treatment of how the clothing of Black and Brown boys and young men is policed. I’m not ignoring it. I’m talking about girls and young women today.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...