Skip to main content

A Failure in Timing?


 

The Columbia Association released their proposed 2022 budget plan Friday. There’s a lot to process there but the thing that stood out for me is the closure of Haven on the Lake. Let me begin by saying that there are plenty of people in this town who know more about the ongoing saga of Haven on the Lake than I do. I am no expert. 

I have heard bits and pieces over the years. Perhaps you have, too. Are you a frequent visitor there? I have never been. I knew from the outset that, while appealing, Haven on the Lake was not an amenity our family could afford. I guess one might say that when the original business plans were made up, CA was not looking at our demographic. 

That’s okay. Not everything has to be for me. Just because it wasn’t in my price range didn’t mean that it wouldn’t provide a valuable service. I’ve always hoped it would be a success.

I was there with my daughter, sometime blogger HoCoHouseHon, at the groundbreaking ceremony at the Lakefront in 2014. You can read about that here.

Two Tales, One City

I’m still disappointed we never got to see former County Executive Ken Ulman jump in the cold plunge pool.

Later on I tried to follow CA’s ongoing disputes with original partner The Still Point, in Lakefront Woes.

Haven on the Lake was an ambitious plan for the Columbia Association. I often wondered if it looked far better on paper or came across better in an elevator pitch than it was ever able to function in real life. It takes a steady and ample supply of people who exceed certain income levels to support a business which is not a purveyor of a “need to have” but rather a “want to have”. 

It seems to me that if Columbia/HoCo has any significant concentration of such folks, they don’t live anywhere near Haven on the Lake. In fact, most don’t live in Columbia proper.

And that brings to mind the long journey of the Downtown Plan and beyond: all the hopes for a more vibrant, livable Downtown Columbia. There are so many pieces to that puzzle. We see new housing, businesses, and various attractions moving towards completion now. We wonder if they will succeed in being the draw to bring the people who truly want to live and work here. 

Was Haven on the Lake the simply right place at the wrong time? Did they jump in too soon?

Perhaps there will be a time in the not too distant future where Downtown Columbia will have become home to the right number people at the right income levels to successfully sustain that kind of business model. Perhaps they are coming, but far too late for Haven.

With the pandemic as an additional variable that no one had in the plans, we don’t know exactly how that will impact future Downtown success. But, since it affects timing - - and timing is interconnected with so many of the relevant pieces of the puzzle - - all of the local hardships as a result of COVID-19 are bound to slow things at the very least. 

There were some rather pointed conversations back in the day about whether CA should even be in the business of selling a luxury product which was out of reach for ordinary Columbians. I find myself wondering what kind of success that same space would have had as a typical CA facility,  conveniently located Downtown near ordinary Columbians. Yes,it’s an expensive location which must mean high operational costs. But would it have made up the cost difference in the number of people it would have served? 

Could it have been the flagship location, a perfect introduction to the CA we want everyone to know and love when they move here from out of town? 

Is it too late? Right now, probably. 

I know for a fact that many of my readers are armchair Columbia Association experts, so feel free to chime in with your comments. Also, if you have questions about Haven on the Lake, the proposed budget, or anything else CA-centric, you’ll want to sign up for their virtual Town Hall Meeting on Thursday, January 21st, at 7:00 pm. Learn more here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more