Skip to main content

More to the Story



How about a little trip outside the bubble this morning for a piece about some new development happening in Baltimore City?

 From 'The Wire' to mixed-income Station Arts housing, Jacques Kelly for The Baltimore Sun

 This photo caught my eye.


Photo credit: Jerry Jackson

The caption: Jacob Wittenberg of Edgemont Builders, left, and Ted Rouse stand at the corner of East Lanvale Street and Guilford Avenue, where they are developing several properties. 

You know my brain went here.


Yes, the developer on this project, Ted Rouse, is the son of Columbia founder James Rouse, though it isn’t mentioned in the article. Another thing not mentioned in the article is how local folks feel about their project. Some comments on Twitter:
Not a single quote from anyone who lives Greenmount West just quotes from the developer. And a "little noticed transformation" by who? Certainly folks who live in the area are noticing this!!

This is nothing but an ad for the development. Utterly foul.

“There was nothing here. I thought it must have been an industrial site.” — Ted Rouse  (Hmm, if only there was someone in the community to ask. Or people in Bmore who know how to do research.) #Plunderers

 The writer of the article, Jacques Kelly, knows his local history and is particularly good at writing this kind of feel-good Baltimore piece. It does seem odd to me that it’s only written from the developers point of view, though. Again, from Twitter:
It's times like this we need City Paper back.....

Then, from Brandon Sodergerg:

I will write about this in the @baltbeat newsletter this week. Baltimore Beat

In Columbia/Howard County we seem to live in an endless merry-go-round of “developers bad”/“Rouse good.” In this particular story we have development and a Rouse and what looks like some missing pieces in the narrative. 

Is this a much needed investment in a long-neglected neighborhood or gentrification in the worst way? I look forward to learning more.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more