Skip to main content

The Five-Star Soirée


 

You’re invited to a Five-Star Soirée! 

Those words caught my eye as I scrolled through Twitter last week. Was it a glamorous fundraiser for a good cause? Not exactly.



Calling all #realtors in the Baltimore area! Miller & Smith is excited to host an #openhouse at their new Multi-Generational home in Ellicott City this Saturday. RSVP now!

#newconstruction #EllicottCity #multigenerationalhomes

It was an announcement for what I guess would be called a broker’s open house in a development called Patapsco Crossing. The developers, Miller and Smith, were hoping to draw in an enthusiastic crowd of real estate professionals to experience the feel of their Bradburne Multigenerational house model.




If I were more familiar with the real estate business, I would know whether an event like this is over the top or par for the course. It made me wonder if real estate brokers have become such a jaded lot that one must bribe them to invest their time with culinary notables and beef sirloin wrapped in bacon.

If you know more, please enlighten me.

Although it was the fanciness if the invitation that grabbed my attention, it was actually one simple word that convinced me to write about it.

Multigenerational.

Is multigenerational housing becomeing a “thing” in the world of real estate? And how does this differ, real estate-wise, from homes that come with a built-in Mother-in-law suite? 

I have several thoughts about this. One is that the first thing I thought of when I read the word multigenerational was The Waltons. After that it was a quick mental step to imagining what the end of day routine would sound like at the Bradburne in Patapsco Crossing. 

My vision of multigenerational living is of families who live together by virtue of necessity, in whatever home that is available to them. Buying million dollar homes? Not so much. Perhaps that is because I see it as coming from a lack of overall financial resources which prompts families to share a variety of resources (financial and otherwise) to support the larger family unit. 

This isn’t necessarily so.

While I was raised to expect that a home would contain the so-called nuclear family, many other cultures view multigenerational living as the norm. And my initial assumption - - that it is prompted by a lack of financial resources - - is far from true in many cases. The ethnically diverse nature of Howard County may mean that more home buyers are seeking a house that is set up to meet those needs that I had realized.

I did go Google-hopping to see if I could see signs of any larger trend in multigenerational living. Apparently there is.

One secret more working parents are discovering: Multigenerational living, Allaya Cooks-Campbell, BetterUp.com

Already common in some cultures and countries, multigenerational living is on the rise in others. Only 12% of American adults lived in a multigenerational home as of 1980. Four decades later, that percentage has more than doubled, to 26%. 

Why the rise? There are practical reasons for multigenerational housing. Most people choose to live together for financial reasons and caregiving at first. For those working adults feeling the pressures of balancing career with caregiving, the high cost of housing and difficulty of arranging for convenient and high-quality care — for children or aging parents — are contributing factors.

Eventually, they find that there are mental and emotional benefits to multigenerational living as well.

I guess it depends on your family. Not everyone was cut out for the emotional dynamics of multigenerational living. And, in the case of Patapsco Crossing, it also depends on your pocketbook. Having always been a teacher (and married to one) my world does not include the possibility of houses in the million dollar range. Clearly HoCo’s high concentration of residents who are in highly-compensated professional careers makes such offerings worthwhile for real estate developers. 

They wouldn’t be putting it out there if they hadn’t carefully researched the market first.

What do you think? Is multigenerational living coming back? Can you imagine doing it? Are you doing it already? Could the American view of the nuclear family be shifting?

Also, are there a lot of these Five-Star Soirées out there in the world of real estate? I’m still rather stunned by that.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more