Skip to main content

In-de-pen-dent

Let's talk definitions:

(Yes, I Googled it.)
As of this moment, no progress has been made to withdraw the two questionable nominees to the County Council's audit committee (chartered from the County Council resolution to review HCPSS budgets.) Wait, not questionable. That's not an accurate choice of words. That suggests that one might question their appointment. In fact, BOE members Ellen Flynn Giles and Ann DeLacy are, by definition, excluded from this committee. Their participation in such a committee is unethical.
From the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
And language from the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002:


Who is ultimately responsible for the creation of this committee and its success or failure? Why, the County Council, of course, through whose diligence and responsiveness to the community we now have the council bill created specifically to address community concerns in the lack of transparency and accountability in the HCPSS budget process.

 

As much as we owe the Council our thanks, we also must hold all of them responsible for the trustworthy execution of this bill and the choices of members of the committee to do this important work. There's absolutely no point to this legislation if it isn't carried out in an ethical way. None.

 

Do I think the Howard County Council wants to be seen as failing the community when it comes to responsive and ethical governance? No, I do not. But I do think they need to hear from constituents that these appointments constitute an outrageous conflict of interest. That's where you come in.

Send an email. Here are the addresses of the County Council and the County Executive:

councilmail@howardcountymd.gov

akittleman@howardcountymd.gov

Sign the petition if you haven't already, and/or share with friends and neighbors.

I know our community is reeling from the devastation of flood damage in Old Ellicott City. Our community leaders are very likely working overtime to help in any way they can. I get that. But I suspect that the people who made these outrageous appointments are hoping that our attention will be directed elsewhere and that this issue will just go away.

Let's not let that happen.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...