Skip to main content

Once Upon a Time in Howard County

 


And they all lived happily ever after.

You already know the story. Angry parents challenged the right of the Howard County School System to have a voting Student Member of the Board. They turned their anger into a lawsuit. That case, heard in Howard County Circuit Court, was unsuccessful. They were granted the right to appeal to Maryland’s highest court. Yesterday the decision was made public.

Maryland’s highest court upholds voting rights for student school board members,  Lillian Reed and Cassidy Jensen, Baltimore Sun 

From the decision:


…we agree with the Board and the circuit court that the General Assembly had the constitutional authority to create a student member position for the Howard County Board, establish a process for the election of such member by students in the Howard County public school system, and grant such student member voting rights.

This decision affirms the legal authority of the school system to honor student voice in a very tangible way. Student voice is not merely some nice term for gathering students in small groups for discussions and saying “we hear you.” It is bigger than inspirational bulletin boards or essay contests. For student voice to be meaningful it has to have teeth, as it were. It needs to be plugged in to where the decisions are being made. 

Students need to be allowed the right to have influence in matters that concern students. The SMOB position is not the only way to honor that, but it is the most powerful affirmation of student voice that we have. Reading the outcome of this case yesterday gave me not only a sense of relief but also a feeling of pure joy. 

Once upon a time in Howard County a Student Member of the Board named Zach Koung was ridiculed and vilified by members of the public.

The Big Lie and the Extremely Tiny Lawsuit, Village Green/Town², December 17, 2020

They don’t like what he does, they don’t like what he says, they don’t like how he says it. They don’t like his facial expressions and his body language. And let’s look at the kinds of things they object to:

  • Speaking to racial equity issues
  • Supporting the removal of SRO’s from schools 
  • Anything that could be characterized as “Progressive”

And then they didn’t like how he voted, either. Hence, the lawsuit. If we don’t like the result of this vote, maybe SMOBs shouldn’t have a vote. It seemed a simple, effective solution.

But it turned out that the SMOB was connected to a network of current and former SMOBs all over the state. This was not any kind of official network. It was an array of like-minded people who had talked the talk and walked the walk since the position of SMOB was created. The lawsuit brought out the skills they had honed during those high school years and revealed the accomplishments they’d achieved since.

They used their voices. 



It was a powerful communication to our community and the state. We believe in this. We have been there. It must have spoken volumes to Mr. Koung. He was not alone.

My telling of our story has no dragons, no evil sorcerers, no knight in shining armor coming over the hill. This is more a tale of angry villagers who have lost their way. The resolution was simple: Maryand State law supports the choices of local jurisdictions to have voting Student Members of the Board. That’s it.

No matter who tells this story (And I suspect it will have a variety of tellings) that last bit is the most important. Don’t let it get lost.

Marcy Leonard, Principal of Wilde Lake High School, was also Howard County’s first SMOB. This morning I read her response to news of the resolution of this case:

*We don’t do TO our students 
*We don’t act FOR our students
*We lead WITH our students

I think it makes a remarkably good epilogue.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more