Skip to main content

The 99 Cent Store


 

I’m wandering a bit off the track this morning. I was having lunch with my daughter outside of several fast casual eating establishments at Columbia Crossing yesterday and I dragged her into one of my favorite conversational rabbit holes: what if?

In the past I’ve explored a variety of “what ifs” on this page, including: what if we had a restaurant called the Magical Soup Company, what if you could get any variety of food by the bucket (like fried chicken), and even, what if the Wilde Lake Village Center were turned into an historical Columbia theme park. I’m fond of imagining things. What can I say?

Yesterday’s topic: 99 cents. 

Let me explain the premise. The establishment of a ninety nine cent payment to download a song on iTunes or a game or other app created the precedent for buying a small piece of something at a low price. You weren’t getting the whole album or an entire gaming system. Instead you could buy one individual thing.

There continues to be a discussion online about whether newspapers should make it possible to pay for individual stories in this way. Don’t have a subscription but really want this article? For ninety-nine cents it’s yours! I haven’t come across any news organizations actually doing this, however. I would use it.

Our lunchtime conversation centered around what other services could work with this kind of model. I told my daughter it didn’t have to be realistic - - we were brainstorming. Here’s what we came up with:

  • Newspaper/magazine articles
  • Advice/therapy/problem solving: one one issue per payment
  • Go into the mall to pick up that one thing you need.
  • Render Fox News unplayable in any public space while you are there.
  • Change any song you don’t like in a restaurant.
  • Tell you where you parked your car when you come out of Target (or the RennFest!)
  • Find an open parking space (and save it until you get there?)
Yes, I know that therapy is worth more than ninety-nine cents. But what if you just need permission to throw out that old box of high school journals? Or help deciding whether to go to Cousin Betsy’s wedding in Vegas? Think of Charles Schulz’ Lucy Van Pelt dispensing brief but positive advice. 

“That’ll be ninety-nine cents, please.”

I’m not wedded to ninety-nine cents, although I do like the sound of it. Still, Dollar Tree is pricing things at $1.25 these days. iTunes is selling current hits for $1.29. Downloadable game apps are now mostly free but come loaded with in-app purchases. I’m not wedded to the actual dollar amount. It’s the concept that intrigues me.

Now it’s your turn. Think of it as a Hump Day diversion. Start with our imaginary ninety-nine cents and think of what kind of item or service would fit this model. It can be silly or serious, just not mean spirited or violent. As always, if I get enough responses I’ll turn them into a whole new blog post.

When I was seven years old we lived in Columbus, Ohio. Some of the local television advertisements were painfully homespun when it came to production values.Most unforgettable: the man who hollered, “Nine cents! Only nine cents! For only nine cents you can get a full living room suit or a live, healthy pony!” 

I’m beginning to think that advert made a deeper impression on me than I realized. I bet living room ‘suits’ and live, healthy ponies are at least ninety nine cents by now.








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more