Skip to main content

Live and Loud


Until my recent stay at home existence, I never really had a big interest in checking out “Facebook Live” events. Let’s just say that the option for anyone to have access to this capability does not mean that everyone is particularly good at it. In most cases I found the prospect of observing live and in-person happenings to be squirmy rather than compelling.

But now the world has changed and my life is filled with Zoom meetings and classes, and I can choose to attend church either through Facebook Live or YouTube. Whereas in the past I would have crossed the street to get away from such experiences, now they are the only connection to people who don’t live in my home.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m probably still not going to click on a Facebook live of someone trying on dresses or interviewing their mom about the “facts of life”. You’ve got to draw the line somewhere when it comes to uncomfortable situations.

Speaking of uncomfortable, I noticed yesterday that the ability to type in comments while an event is in progress may not always be helpful. There was an online BOE Candidate event for District 4 hosted by Scott Ewart. I missed the debate itself, but many of the live comments generated by the event were hair raising. If you had any doubt as to the anger and unpleasantness generated by the BOE race this year, these comments alone would enlighten you.

This is not a criticism of Mr. Ewart. His goal was to provide an informative event. I’m guessing he did not anticipate the toxic quality of the discourse. After all, the focus of such an event is meant to be the candidates. After having read the comments I’d have to say that the candidates would have been better served had the live commenting been disabled. The resulting atmosphere was a cross between the crowd at a prize fight, spectators at the Roman Coliseum, and contestants on Let’s Make A Deal, with a little American high school football thrown in.

If we were attending a candidate debate in person, the expectation would be to listen politely. Perhaps an especially inspiring response would evoke a bit of applause. But having the event take place online where none of the audience could be seen appeared to take away the expectation for polite behavior. Suddenly it was more like the old Howard County Times comment section.

There’s a reason they disabled comments, you know. Sadly I think live commenting for this debate had the very same quality. If that’s what Columbia/HoCo looks like, we are in deep trouble.

A positive note about live commenting. I have seen it work. During church services it is used by congregants greeting one another, passing the peace, sharing prayer requests. I also saw the folks at Clark’s Elioak Farm respond to viewers’ questions in real time while doing a Facebook Live event with their baby goats. It can be a positive, interactive experience.

But perhaps it’s not a good idea for events where people are not likely to show self control. It appears to give people a feeling that there are no boundaries and that they don’t need to exercise the usual filters for self expression that they would (I hope) use “in real life”. A candidate debate should be about ideas, not about who in the audience is the loudest.

Our world brings us new technologies to explore. Sometimes they have unintended consequences.








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more