Skip to main content

Still Life



If there were an award for generating the best free publicity, it would surely go to the Inn at Little Washington. Located in Washington, Virginia, their five star restaurant experience is well known even in Columbia/HoCo from the accounts of those who can afford a visit.

 The Inn at Little Washington made a big splash this week with the news that they would be complying with the 50 per cent occupancy rule for restaurants by employing well-dressed mannequins as patrons at the other tables. From this week’s article in The Washingtonian:

 The chef (who majored in drama in college) has been working with Shirlington’s Signature Theatre to get the faux humans costumed in 1940s-era garb. Servers will be instructed to pour them wine and to ask them about their evening.

This story, in various permutations and with accompanying photographs, has been all over the internet and even on television this week. For a sampling, just do a Google search for The Inn at Little Washington. I don’t know how much it will cost to procure and dress the mannequins, but I think the outlay will be far surpassed by the resultant publicity. 

 As for me, even if I had the disposable income to indulge myself in what I have heard is a truly life-changing culinary experience, the new dining room set up would be a deterrent. The moment I read about the mannequins I could think of nothing but the automatons in Mancini’s Family Restaurant, the setting for a truly horrifying scene in a 2014 episode of Dr. Who. 

 Do you think any local restaurants will hop on to this trend? Tersiguels? The Elkridge Furnace Inn? Perhaps the Kings Contrivance? What about Clyde’s?

 If you are intrigued and hankering to have a five star dining experience surrounded by well dressed, well behaved fellow “diners”, make sure your budget is up for the trip. A sample menu on the website reveals that their tasting menu is 248 dollars per person, with optional wine pairings at 180 dollars per person. I’m not sure if their special Kitchen Table option is currently available, but that will set you back an additional 595 dollars. 

 I wonder if you can get a discount if you bring your own mannequins.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more