Skip to main content

Unions/Reunions

 


On the morning of July 29th an unexpected occurrence in the Village of Wilde Lake was reported in the Howard County Eats Facebook Group.

Starbucks was closed.


Here’s a close up.


I filed this away in my ‘curious things I probably should follow up on’ file. When I saw this article in the Baltimore Banner it jogged my memory.



Baristas at Columbia’s Wilde Lake Starbucks vote to unionize, Jess Nocera,  Baltimore Banner 

In a 19-to-3 vote, the Columbia location’s workers voted to join Starbucks Workers United late last month.

“Late last month.” July 29th, perhaps? Might that explain the morning closure in Wilde Lake?

As an aside, I was startled to see exactly who the Banner seems to think those baristas are. Take a closer look at the photo.


Caption reads: Baristas at the Wilde Lake Starbucks in Columbia have voted to unionize. (Jerry Jackson/The Baltimore
Banner)

Friends, those are not the baristas you are looking for, unless life in retirement for former local electeds is a lot tougher than I thought it was.

I suspect this is a recycled photo from a Banner article in 2025, which I wrote about here:

Wilde Lake Takes the (Coffee) Cup, Village Green/Town², May 12, 2025

I’m surprised that the Banner doesn’t have a stock photo of the Wilde Lake Starbucks. At any rate, after suggesting that the people pictured are hocolocal “movers and shakers” in 2025, the Banner can hardly expect us to believe that they’re unionizing baristas in 2026. 

Good grief.

Speaking of movers and shakers, let’s talk about unions. A lot of the people I know who patronize this Starbucks think of themselves as Progressives, Liberals, whatever the current term for that is. And yet I wonder if they will support workers as they unionize and engage in collective bargaining actions with management.

Since the Merriweather Lakehouse labor debacle I have seen far too much squishy - - no, downright wishy-washy - - support for unions from locals who say they support unions. This bothers me. It is not enough to support workers’ rights in theory only, and then disappear when a real live situation turns up in your community. 

I feel as though we (yes, I mean local Democrats) paint ourselves as the party of labor but it’s more talking the talk than walking the walk. We don’t follow through. We have excuses. We support labor but just not that labor. 

Why is that? 

In closing, here’s a bit from a post I wrote back in March. 

This is very basic. Am I correct in assuming that workers would not go to the effort to organize/establish a union if their relationship with management was satisfactory? In other words, that unions come about because of an unresolved problem or problems?

I reached out to a friend whose area of expertise is precisely this. They explained:

Yes. Basically any imbalance of power over time is going to create a dynamic where workers will want a say in their workplace. Generally, the fear of going after a union and up against management has to be greater than the fear that if you do nothing, things continue to be intolerable. In other words, things have to be pretty bad, because most people's default position is 'don't rock the boat'.

In other words, workers don’t unionize just for fun. It’s not a frivolous decision. 

So…who will the movers and shakers stand with? Who will we stand with?



Village Green/Town² Comments

Comments

  1. Julia A. McCreadyAugust 9, 2026 at 5:12 AM


    Please do not submit comments here. This function will be disabled shortly. Use the link above instead. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

F ³: We Are Not Entitled

  A college student went missing. His family and friends were distraught. The community was encouraged to be on the lookout and spread the word.  Days passed.  They must have been agonizing days for those who cared about the missing student. Thoughts that foul play had been involved cannot have been far from their thoughts.  Then, at last, the student was found. Alive. The news was shared with the public.  So. Much. Relief. A family had been reunited with their child. Even though we know that life is complicated, I think it is okay to accept this as a happy ending and leave it at that.  But the world of social media says no. For every expression of joy at the news came questions and even judgement. It became clear to me that some folks felt entitled to an explanation. They wanted the backstory. It’s as though they felt that, by enlisting the help of the public on social media, the authorities now owed them all the details. Television dramas often weave curr...
2 comments
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more