Skip to main content

Money/Mouth


People seem to be taking more of an interest in local news these days. I know this because I am seeing a steady stream of people complaining that they can’t read HoCo Times/Baltimore Sun articles without having a subscription.

“It just isn’t fair!”

Do you think a well-informed community is a public good? Or, at least, the opportunity to become well-informed? Should the access to local news be a right?

It seems that people feel that reading the news should be as easy as going to the library and checking out a book. When they learn they have to pay to read the news, they are affronted. They suggest that it’s some kind of money making scam.

The library system is supported by our tax dollars because we have decided that a free library system is a public good. That is why you can use any of their services for free. A newspaper is a business and they require money to cover their operating expenses. Their reporters need salaries to survive, just like you do.

Do you think that being able to read high quality news coverage is something you are entitled to for free? How would that work, exactly? Remember, the library isn’t free. You just don’t pay at the point of service. So, if we decided that news was a public good, and supported it with tax dollars, it still wouldn’t be free. The money would still have to come from somewhere.

But there’s a huge difference between a library and a newspaper. It is vitally important that journalists are separate from the powers that be, in order to maintain independence. Would you really want a newspaper funded by government? Wouldn’t you be concerned that those in power could exert influence over what news you got to see? “A free press” doesn’t mean without cost. It means independent.

We can’t have it both ways.

High quality, professional journalism is not going to run hot and cold out of your tap whenever you feel the need. You have to pay for it. It’s not a free gift you are entitled to. It’s an investment we all need to make.


Post Script: you can read daily newspapers for free at your local public library.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teacher Gifts

Today is the last day of school before the Winter Break. It’s a good time to remember the far-reaching nature of our public school system. You may not have children. You may have sent your children to independent schools. It matters not. You will be impacted one way or another. Yesterday I read a long thread on Facebook about several waves of illness in the schools right now. There’s influenza A and norovirus, I believe. And of course there’s COVID. Apparently in some individual schools the rate of illness is high enough for school admin to notify parents.  When I was little the acceptable holiday gift for a teacher was one of those lovely floral handkerchief squares. (I don’t know what it was for male teachers. They were rare in my elementary years.) These days the range of teacher gifts is wider and I have fond memories of Target gift cards which I have written about before. I think it’s safe to say that giving one’s teacher Influenza, norovirus, or COVID is not the ideal holiday...
1 comment
Read more

They Can Wait

This is not a typical Saturday post. That’s because, in my community, it’s not a typical Saturday.  Oakland Mills High School, after years of deferred repair, needs massive renovation. It’s pretty simple: when you don’t fix a problem it gets bigger. The school system itself said the the OMHS school building was  "no longer conducive to learning" back in 2018.  2018 .  But Thursday the Boad of Education voted to push it out of the lineup of important projects which will be given the go-ahead to proceed soonest.  In my opinion it’s a terrible decision and sets a dangerous precedent. To explain, here’s the advocacy letter I sent in support of Oakland Mills High School. I was rather proud of it. I am writing to ask you to proceed with needed renovation at Oakland Mills High School in the most timely and comprehensive manner humanly possible. I have read the letter sent to you by the Oakland Mills Community Association and I am in complete agreement. You are extremel...
1 comment
Read more

Separate and Unequal

  Remember “Separate but equal”? Remember how that really meant that Black schools languished in  broken-down buildings without adequate heat or toilet facilities, with cast-off, ragged learning materials, underfunded and largely ignored? The Supreme Court struck that down in 1954. The evidence was clear that separate was not equal. Plessy v Ferguson had led to - - no, endorsed - - deeply unequal schooling and opportunities. We tend to think of Brown v Board as being purely about racial integration. It was not.  It was about the logical consequences of segregation. And they were not, not, not equal. The ruling in 1954 didn’t transform public education for non-whites into a land of milk and honey by any means. But it articulated some essential truths in a way that made including everyone a legal precedent which could be relied upon and built upon. It was better than what came before it but it rested upon unsteady ground. It did not necessarily change the hearts or minds ...
1 comment
Read more